<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for the 108 Stitches</title>
	<link>http://the108stitches.com</link>
	<description>Dissecting baseball one stitch at a time.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Predictions by 2008 MLB Predictions &#124; the 108 Stitches</title>
		<link>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/08/predictions/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 MLB Predictions &#124; the 108 Stitches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/08/predictions/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>[...] yourself. In all honesty, I sketched out these a little less than a month ago and posted some of my award winners approximately a month ago. I still stand by those predictions even though Jeremy Hermida and Elijah [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] yourself. In all honesty, I sketched out these a little less than a month ago and posted some of my award winners approximately a month ago. I still stand by those predictions even though Jeremy Hermida and Elijah [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Auspicious Alexei by Launch Sequence Initiated &#124; the 108 Stitches</title>
		<link>http://the108stitches.com/2008/02/28/auspicious-alexei/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Launch Sequence Initiated &#124; the 108 Stitches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://the108stitches.com/2008/02/28/auspicious-alexei/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>[...] you missed my post earlier this spring on White Sox youngster Alexei Ramirez, you should check it out. At that point in camp it was far from certain that he would have a regular role with the team or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you missed my post earlier this spring on White Sox youngster Alexei Ramirez, you should check it out. At that point in camp it was far from certain that he would have a regular role with the team or [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sleeper Showdown: Yunel Escobar vs. Stephen Drew by Matt</title>
		<link>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/27/sleeper-showdown-yunel-escobar-vs-stephen-drew/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/27/sleeper-showdown-yunel-escobar-vs-stephen-drew/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Well..I am a bit bias...however Stephen Drew wins this hands down. I think you will see marginal improvement from each player in the Dbacks lineup this year, from Chris Young to Justin Upton. This marginal improvement will lead to higher team batting average, RBIs and Runs across the board. Pretty much everyone on the roster but Eric Byrnes can be considered a sleeper...but we'll see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well..I am a bit bias&#8230;however Stephen Drew wins this hands down. I think you will see marginal improvement from each player in the Dbacks lineup this year, from Chris Young to Justin Upton. This marginal improvement will lead to higher team batting average, RBIs and Runs across the board. Pretty much everyone on the roster but Eric Byrnes can be considered a sleeper&#8230;but we&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boo Boo for B.J. by Patch</title>
		<link>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/20/boo-boo-for-bj/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Patch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/20/boo-boo-for-bj/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Well seeing how it was "Flame Thower" Paul Byrd who hit him. It must have bruised his Funny bone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well seeing how it was &#8220;Flame Thower&#8221; Paul Byrd who hit him. It must have bruised his Funny bone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Player Rankings by cbracke</title>
		<link>http://the108stitches.com/player-rankings/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>cbracke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://the108stitches.com/player-rankings/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>HW- Thanks for the comment! I debated long and hard on Milledge and in reality, I'll probably sub him in for Teahen at the back of the list. I realize that Milledge has the opportunity now, but I'm just not as confident as the rest of the world that he's improved his plate discipline enough to be a regular starter for fantasy owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HW- Thanks for the comment! I debated long and hard on Milledge and in reality, I&#8217;ll probably sub him in for Teahen at the back of the list. I realize that Milledge has the opportunity now, but I&#8217;m just not as confident as the rest of the world that he&#8217;s improved his plate discipline enough to be a regular starter for fantasy owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Player Rankings by HW</title>
		<link>http://the108stitches.com/player-rankings/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>HW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://the108stitches.com/player-rankings/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Where is Lastings Milledge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is Lastings Milledge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sleeper Showdown: Ryan Garko vs. James Loney by cbracke</title>
		<link>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/10/sleeper-showdown-ryan-garko-vs-james-loney/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>cbracke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/10/sleeper-showdown-ryan-garko-vs-james-loney/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Dan- I appreciate the great stats and comment! Yeah, after breaking apart the numbers last night, there is simply no way Garko is in Loney's class. I still believe Garko has more HR upside, but that is the only possible, miniscule edge he has over a far superior first baseman in Loney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan- I appreciate the great stats and comment! Yeah, after breaking apart the numbers last night, there is simply no way Garko is in Loney&#8217;s class. I still believe Garko has more HR upside, but that is the only possible, miniscule edge he has over a far superior first baseman in Loney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sleeper Showdown: Ryan Garko vs. James Loney by Dan Lowe</title>
		<link>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/10/sleeper-showdown-ryan-garko-vs-james-loney/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/10/sleeper-showdown-ryan-garko-vs-james-loney/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I comment about this everywhere Loney's name comes up, maybe cause I don't want him to be a sleeper, maybe so I can say 'I told you so' (this is fantasy baseball) -- I don't know.  Either way, anyone who happens to read anything about James Loney on the internet where there happens to a comment box just might have seen this already.

I'll try to condense this this time, though:

1.) Loney's prorated stats are better than Adrian Gonzalez's.  Loney was also much better than Gonzalez is the time the two played simultaneously.  Everyone loves "Yo!" Adrian, and for good reason.  &lt;i&gt;Modus Pollendo Ponens...&lt;/i&gt;

Alright, that's not a very fair comparison, and nor is it useful.  But...

2.)According to Bill James' website, Loney's 'Batting Performance By Quality of Opposing Pitcher' splits in 2007 went like this:

    &lt;b&gt;Vs. pitcher with ERA less than/= 3.50 - 91 AB, .319/6/19/.950 OPS&lt;/b&gt;

...which was comparable to the number of at-bats he got in the next two higher levels (93 in 3.51 to 4.25, 104 in 4.26 to 5.25).

In that same category (vs. ERA less than/= 3.50), Gonzalez, in 129 AB (!), went .240/5/14/.721.

Furthermore, the numbers for the top-five first basemen (based on a few different lists that I may or may not agree with) are as follows:

    &lt;b&gt;Ortiz - 109 AB, .193/5/17/.631
    Howard - 117 AB, .256/4/19/.833
    Pujols - 111 AB, .270/7/19/.892
    Fielder - 110 AB, .182/6/12/.682
    Teixeira - 85 AB, .259/4/12/.790&lt;/b&gt;

While I'd have to take the time to see who it was exactly, Loney seemed to have his way with good pitching in '07, and to an extent that, out of the top-5 first baseman going into 2008, only Albert Pujols had comparable numbers (in 20 more at-bats).

(And, so not to seem like I'm emphasizing his numbers unfairly, Loney's numbers against other pitching levels were as follows: vs. ERA 3.51-4.25, .280/3/16/.801, vs. 4.26-5.25, .346/4/21/.903, and vs. over/= 5.25, .389/2/11/1.063.)

I know; Loney was never scathing in the minor leagues, nor would he seem all that impressive in his 102 AB in 2006 (besides that fun 9 RBI game in Colorado).

For what it's worth, though, out of those 102 '06 at-bats, 22 were against ERA less than/= 3.50 pitchers.  Loney hit .409 with an OPS over 1.000, the best of any of his performance ranges.  The guy who was just 'good' against minor league hurlers has been 'nasty' against the best of the MLB in his first 446 major league at-bats.  I'll gladly take him over Konerko or Helton, and in Round 6 if need be.

(For what &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt;'s worth, I've gotten Loney from 110-120 (9th/10th round) in every mock or draft I've done so far, and as a backup, so he hasn't been that expensive.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I comment about this everywhere Loney&#8217;s name comes up, maybe cause I don&#8217;t want him to be a sleeper, maybe so I can say &#8216;I told you so&#8217; (this is fantasy baseball) &#8212; I don&#8217;t know.  Either way, anyone who happens to read anything about James Loney on the internet where there happens to a comment box just might have seen this already.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to condense this this time, though:</p>
<p>1.) Loney&#8217;s prorated stats are better than Adrian Gonzalez&#8217;s.  Loney was also much better than Gonzalez is the time the two played simultaneously.  Everyone loves &#8220;Yo!&#8221; Adrian, and for good reason.  <i>Modus Pollendo Ponens&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Alright, that&#8217;s not a very fair comparison, and nor is it useful.  But&#8230;</p>
<p>2.)According to Bill James&#8217; website, Loney&#8217;s &#8216;Batting Performance By Quality of Opposing Pitcher&#8217; splits in 2007 went like this:</p>
<p>    <b>Vs. pitcher with ERA less than/= 3.50 - 91 AB, .319/6/19/.950 OPS</b></p>
<p>&#8230;which was comparable to the number of at-bats he got in the next two higher levels (93 in 3.51 to 4.25, 104 in 4.26 to 5.25).</p>
<p>In that same category (vs. ERA less than/= 3.50), Gonzalez, in 129 AB (!), went .240/5/14/.721.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the numbers for the top-five first basemen (based on a few different lists that I may or may not agree with) are as follows:</p>
<p>    <b>Ortiz - 109 AB, .193/5/17/.631<br />
    Howard - 117 AB, .256/4/19/.833<br />
    Pujols - 111 AB, .270/7/19/.892<br />
    Fielder - 110 AB, .182/6/12/.682<br />
    Teixeira - 85 AB, .259/4/12/.790</b></p>
<p>While I&#8217;d have to take the time to see who it was exactly, Loney seemed to have his way with good pitching in &#8216;07, and to an extent that, out of the top-5 first baseman going into 2008, only Albert Pujols had comparable numbers (in 20 more at-bats).</p>
<p>(And, so not to seem like I&#8217;m emphasizing his numbers unfairly, Loney&#8217;s numbers against other pitching levels were as follows: vs. ERA 3.51-4.25, .280/3/16/.801, vs. 4.26-5.25, .346/4/21/.903, and vs. over/= 5.25, .389/2/11/1.063.)</p>
<p>I know; Loney was never scathing in the minor leagues, nor would he seem all that impressive in his 102 AB in 2006 (besides that fun 9 RBI game in Colorado).</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, though, out of those 102 &#8216;06 at-bats, 22 were against ERA less than/= 3.50 pitchers.  Loney hit .409 with an OPS over 1.000, the best of any of his performance ranges.  The guy who was just &#8216;good&#8217; against minor league hurlers has been &#8216;nasty&#8217; against the best of the MLB in his first 446 major league at-bats.  I&#8217;ll gladly take him over Konerko or Helton, and in Round 6 if need be.</p>
<p>(For what <i>that</i>&#8217;s worth, I&#8217;ve gotten Loney from 110-120 (9th/10th round) in every mock or draft I&#8217;ve done so far, and as a backup, so he hasn&#8217;t been that expensive.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LaRoche Clipped by Chris</title>
		<link>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/07/laroche-clipped/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 03:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://the108stitches.com/2008/03/07/laroche-clipped/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Bracks,

LaRoche gets a tough break here...he will miss a ton of time, but should be back in July. Even then, he will likely struggle at the plate as he tries to find his grip strength and bat speed.

I like your blog and have subscribed. Check mine out. I'm a Physical Therapist who deals with injury reports and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bracks,</p>
<p>LaRoche gets a tough break here&#8230;he will miss a ton of time, but should be back in July. Even then, he will likely struggle at the plate as he tries to find his grip strength and bat speed.</p>
<p>I like your blog and have subscribed. Check mine out. I&#8217;m a Physical Therapist who deals with injury reports and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ask Mr. Bracks by cbracke</title>
		<link>http://the108stitches.com/ask-the-expert/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>cbracke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 03:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://the108stitches.com/ask-the-expert/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Fred-
Knowing the rules, I like Hafner, Kazmir, Young, and possibly Burnett. I think you'll get good numbers from the first three over the next couple years and Burnett is a wild card, but could be extremely productive if he stays healthy. That's a BIG if though. Hafner is a tricky one if he's only eligible at utlity. Still, he's worth the risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred-<br />
Knowing the rules, I like Hafner, Kazmir, Young, and possibly Burnett. I think you&#8217;ll get good numbers from the first three over the next couple years and Burnett is a wild card, but could be extremely productive if he stays healthy. That&#8217;s a BIG if though. Hafner is a tricky one if he&#8217;s only eligible at utlity. Still, he&#8217;s worth the risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
